In the United States, the most prevalent mechanism of carbapenem
resistance among
Enterobacteriaceae is the production of a
Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). KPC-producing isolates often
exhibit a range of carbapenem MICs. To better understand the
factors that contribute to overall carbapenem resistance, we
analyzed 27 KPC-producing
K. pneumoniae isolates with different
levels of carbapenem resistance, 11 with low-level (i.e., meropenem
or imipenem MIC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/718d9/718d9f0aec8a1d28877ca1d0d7e5351e4e49ced2" alt="≤"
4 µg/ml), 2 with intermediate-level (i.e.,
meropenem and imipenem MIC = 8 µg/ml), and 14 with high-level
(i.e., imipenem or meropenem MIC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a96c/5a96c3a384bbfa57789e3f37deb99859f7859912" alt="≥"
16 µg/ml) carbapenem
resistance, that were received from throughout the United States.
Among 14 isolates that exhibited high-level carbapenem resistance,
Western blot analysis indicated that 10 produced an elevated
amount of KPC. These isolates either contained an increased
blaKPC gene copy number (
n = 3) or had deletions directly upstream
of the
blaKPC gene (
n = 7). Four additional isolates lacked
elevated KPC production but had high-level carbapenem resistance.
Porin sequencing analysis identified 22 isolates potentially
lacking a functional OmpK35 and three isolates potentially lacking
a functional OmpK36. The highest carbapenem MICs were found
in two isolates that lacked both functioning porins and produced
elevated amounts of KPC. The 11 isolates with low-level carbapenem
resistance contained neither an upstream deletion nor increased
blaKPC copy number. These results suggest that both
blaKPC copy
number and deletions in the upstream genetic environment affect
the level of KPC production and may contribute to high-level
carbapenem resistance in KPC-producing
K. pneumoniae, particularly
when coupled with OmpK36 porin loss.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2010, p. 4201-4207, Vol. 54, No. 10
0066-4804/10/$12.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00008-10
No comments:
Post a Comment